Evidence · Case 04 · The Trinity

Lying to the Spirit is lying to God, Acts 5:3-4

One exhibit from the free evidence repository at apologetics.pro.

Suggest a correction
Peter tells Ananias he has lied to the Holy Spirit, then says in the next breath, “You have not lied to man but to God.” Lying is something you can only do to a someone.

Sources

Objections & responses

The New Testament treats the Holy Spirit as a person who acts, not as an impersonal force or energy.Couldn’t “lying to the Spirit is lying to God” just mean the Spirit is God’s power or presence? That identifies the Spirit with God without making the Spirit a separate person.

A good point, and Acts 5 does primarily support the deity of the Spirit; it supports personhood only insofar as lying is something done to a someone. The distinction of the Spirit from the Father comes from other texts: the Spirit is sent by the Father and the Son, intercedes with the Father, and is named as a third party in the baptismal formula. Acts 5 gives one leg of the argument, not both, and it should not be asked to carry more.

The New Testament identifies the Holy Spirit with God directly, not just as a person but as one who shares in what only God is.Isn’t this just Semitic parallelism, where a line is restated a second way for emphasis rather than to identify two things as one? Hebrew and Aramaic-influenced speech does this constantly, and Trinitarians reading personal identity into a poetic restatement risk circular reasoning, assuming the doctrine and then finding it confirmed.

Parallelism restates a single referent, so if “the Holy Spirit” and “God” are functioning as parallel names for the one Ananias wronged, that is the identification this claim needs, not an alternative to it. What parallelism does not settle by itself is whether that referent is a distinct person within God or simply God under another title, which is why this evidence has to stand alongside the rest rather than carry the claim on its own.

Appears under 2 claims in this case