How this site is built
Editorial standards
This site argues a position: that Christianity is true, and that the case for it holds up under real scrutiny. We are not neutral, and we do not pretend to be. What we owe you instead is honesty about how that case gets built. AI tools helped draft some of the text on this site.
Every claim is sourced
Each piece of evidence links to the citations behind it, so you can read the original scholarship instead of taking our summary of it on faith. If a source does not hold up, the claim resting on it does not either.
Objections get their strongest form
We answer the best version of an argument against a claim, not a weaker one built to lose. When a case has a serious rebuttal, that rebuttal is stated in its own terms before we respond to it.
We fix what is wrong
Claims get revised when they should. We would rather correct a mistake than defend one.
These standards apply to every case on the site, finished or still in progress, and to every piece of evidence behind it. Spot a mistake? Suggest a correction.