Objection · Case 03 · Reliability of Scripture

Nobody doubted Pilate existed; Josephus, Philo, and Tacitus all mention him. What does the stone add?

One objection from the free evidence repository at apologetics.pro.

Suggest a correction

Response

Fair in one sense: Pilate’s existence was never in serious doubt. The stone’s value is that it is a contemporary inscription rather than a later literary reference, that it fixes his correct title (prefect), and that it confirms the Gospels’ picture of a Roman governor based at Caesarea. It is a small corroboration and should be weighed as one.

About this exhibit

This objection is to The Pilate Stone.

In 1961, a team led by Antonio Frova found a limestone block at Caesarea, reused in a theater, carrying the name Pontius Pilate and the title “prefect of Judea.”

Under Claim 03: Archaeology backs up specific people, places, and details in the Bible.