Objection · Case 03 · Reliability of Scripture

4QJosh-a places the altar-building episode at a different point in the narrative than the Masoretic Text. Isn’t that a structural difference, not a copying slip?

One objection from the free evidence repository at apologetics.pro.

Suggest a correction

Response

Correct, and this is a case where Qumran may preserve an older arrangement, since Josephus also seems to know the altar episode in that position. With only two copies the base is thin, and Joshua is one of the books where the text form genuinely varied in this period. It does not undermine the claim that the book’s content was preserved: the same events appear in both, in a different order at one point, and the difference is on the table for anyone to weigh.

About this exhibit

This objection is to Joshua.

About 2 copies of Joshua were found among the historical books.

Under Claim 02: The Dead Sea Scrolls show the Old Testament text was copied with remarkable stability across about a thousand years, alongside a documented plurality of text forms.