apologetics.pro

Evidence · Case 03 · Reliability of Scripture

Tel Dan Stele

One exhibit from the free evidence repository at apologetics.pro.

Suggest a correction
A 9th-century BC Aramaic victory inscription found at Tel Dan by Avraham Biran’s team in 1993, with two more joining fragments found in 1994, contains the phrase bytdwd, ‘House of David,’ the first hard evidence outside the Bible for David’s dynasty. Some minimalists (for example Philip Davies) contested the reading, proposing other ways to divide the letters, but it is accepted by most scholars and epigraphers.

Exhibits

View full sizeShow smallerOpen the original file (opens in a new tab)
Tel Dan Stele

Sources

Objections & responses

“bytdwd” has no word divider; it could be a place name or a temple name rather than “House of David.” And even if it is David’s dynasty, that only shows a ninth-century kingdom claimed descent from a David.

Both points are fair and should stay visible. The House of David reading is accepted by the large majority of epigraphers because house of X is the standard Aramaic and Assyrian way of naming a dynasty, the parallel king of Israel appears in the same inscription, and no place called Beth-Dod is otherwise attested. On the second point, the stele is offered only as evidence for David’s dynasty, which is exactly what it shows: within about 130 years of David’s traditional dates, an enemy king recognized a Judahite royal house named after him. That is what you would expect if David existed, and not what you would expect if he was invented centuries later.

Appears under 1 claim in this case

Read it in context