Objection · Case 01 · Historical Jesus

Tacitus calls Pilate a procurator, but the Pilate Stone shows he was a prefect. Doesn’t that mistake suggest Tacitus was just repeating what Christians said?

One objection from the free evidence repository at apologetics.pro.

Suggest a correction

Response

The title slip is real and worth conceding. But procurator had become the standard title for governors of Judea by Tacitus’s own day, and Roman writers routinely used current titles for earlier officials; Josephus does the same. The slip shows Tacitus writing from a second-century vantage point, not copying Christians, whom he openly despised and was unlikely to trust without checking. Even on the most skeptical reading, a hostile Roman senator around AD 116 treated the execution of Christ under Pilate as a plain fact, which is all this exhibit needs.

About this exhibit

This objection is to Tacitus, Annals 15.44.

Tacitus was a Roman senator and historian, and no friend of Christianity. Around 116 AD, describing how the emperor Nero blamed Christians for the great fire of Rome in 64 AD, he explains that the…

Under Claim 02: Jesus is attested as a real person by non-Christian ancient historians.