Objection · Case 13 · Scientology
Remini and Rinder are the Church’s most prominent and litigious critics, and their television series was adversarial by design. Isn’t citing them for cost figures citing hostile witnesses whose numbers can’t be verified?
One objection from the free evidence repository at apologetics.pro.
Response
Their accounts are firsthand recollections, not audited totals, and they belong below the scholarly estimate for exactly that reason. Their hostility is a reason to weight them lightly. They are included only because their figures fall within the range Urban derived from the Church’s own price lists, which is corroboration rather than the basis of the claim. If you set them aside entirely, the claim stands on Urban.
About this exhibit
This objection is to Former members Leah Remini and Mike Rinder (public accounts).
Former members have described the cost from the inside. In her series, Leah Remini, with former church executive Mike Rinder, estimated that reaching the top tiers could run in the area of half a…