Objection · Case 13 · Scientology

Many religions ask members to distance themselves from harmful influences, and adults are free to choose their associations. Isn’t singling out Scientology unfair?

One objection from the free evidence repository at apologetics.pro.

Suggest a correction

Response

Choosing one’s associations is a real freedom, and healthy boundaries are not the issue. The difference critics point to is the direction of the pressure: disconnection is applied to keep members inside by cutting ties with those who question the group, rather than to protect anyone from abuse. When the practice reliably severs parents from children because one side left a church, calling it merely personal choice does not fit the accounts. Comparable pressure in any group would draw the same concern.

About this exhibit

This objection is to Firsthand accounts and reporting.

Investigative books and testimony, including from Hubbard’s own family and from figures who left the church, document disconnection separating close relatives. The church maintains it is voluntary;…

Under Claim 06: Scientology’s disconnection policy, written into Hubbard’s own policy letters, has members cut off family and friends labelled “Suppressive”, and it has broken up families.