Objection · Case 08 · Science

There’s a fourth option missing: a deeper physical theory may show the constants aren’t free parameters at all but are fixed by necessity. Wouldn’t that dissolve the problem without luck, multiverse, or design?

One objection from the free evidence repository at apologetics.pro.

Suggest a correction

Response

Many physicists do expect this, and it belongs on the list. The reply from design defenders is that a theory fixing the constants by necessity would itself be a remarkable fact requiring explanation: why should the only possible physics be life-permitting? On that view the fine-tuning relocates rather than vanishes. Whether that reply works is contested. Treat necessity as a live fourth option, and weigh the design proponent’s response to it alongside the other three.

About this exhibit

This objection is to The multiverse.

On this view there are vast numbers of universes with different constants, so a life permitting one is bound to occur somewhere, and naturally we find ourselves in it, since we could not exist…

Under Claim 10: There are three serious explanations for fine-tuning, and design is not the unscientific option among them.