Objection · Case 08 · Science

The fine-tuning is for life as we know it. Different constants might permit different kinds of life, or kinds of complexity we can’t imagine.

One objection from the free evidence repository at apologetics.pro.

Suggest a correction

Response

Many fine-tuning cases are not about life specifically but about whether anything complex can exist at all. A universe with no stars, no stable atoms, or one that recollapses in a fraction of a second has no chemistry of any kind, and other kinds of life does not help there. For the cases that really are life-specific, the objection has force, and defenders of the argument usually concede it. The argument is strongest where it rests on the structural cases, and that is where it should be pressed.

About this exhibit

This objection is to Luke Barnes’s review of the fine-tuning literature.

Barnes, an astrophysicist, surveyed the technical literature and catalogued cases where small changes to the constants or the starting conditions produce a sterile universe. He wrote the review…

Under Claim 07: The basic constants of physics sit in narrow ranges that allow stars, chemistry, and life, and shifting them even slightly would rule life out.