Objection · Case 08 · Science

Hubble himself never accepted that expansion implied a beginning, and expansion is compatible with steady-state models that were taken seriously until the 1960s.

One objection from the free evidence repository at apologetics.pro.

Suggest a correction

Response

Both true. Expansion alone did not settle the question; the steady-state model was a live alternative until the microwave background killed it, and Hubble stayed agnostic. Hubble’s measurement is cited as the observational turning point: the first evidence that the universe is not static, which is what everyone from Aristotle to Einstein had assumed. The next exhibit, the cosmic microwave background, is what made a hot, dense beginning the mainstream view.

About this exhibit

This objection is to Edwin Hubble’s 1929 measurement of galaxy distances and speeds.

Hubble compared how far away galaxies are with how fast they are receding and found that more distant galaxies move away faster. That pattern is the signature of an expanding universe, and it is the…

Under Claim 01: The universe had a beginning rather than existing forever.