Objection · Case 02 · Resurrection of Christ

Jerusalem had many rock-cut tombs and the women visited at dawn in distress. Confusion is plausible, and saying opponents could have produced the body assumes anyone cared enough to look.

One objection from the free evidence repository at apologetics.pro.

Suggest a correction

Response

The Gospels say the women watched the burial and knew the location, and Joseph of Arimathea, who owned the tomb, knew where he had put the body. But grant the confusion anyway. The theory explains only an empty tomb, not appearances to individuals and groups, not Paul, not James. And the authorities did care: they had executed Jesus to end a movement that within weeks was announcing his resurrection in their own city. Walking to the right tomb was the cheapest refutation available.

About this exhibit

This objection is to The wrong tomb.

The claim here is that the women and disciples simply went to the wrong grave, found it empty, and jumped to the conclusion that Jesus had risen. The strongest form of this view is that a mistake in…

Under Claim 05: A real resurrection is the best explanation of the facts.