Objection · Case 02 · Resurrection of Christ

Grief hallucinations are common: up to half of bereaved spouses report sensing or seeing the dead. The disciples were bereaved. Isn’t this a natural, well-documented phenomenon?

One objection from the free evidence repository at apologetics.pro.

Suggest a correction

Response

Bereavement experiences are real and common, which is why this is the strongest natural explanation on offer. But the documented pattern is instructive. Bereavement visions are brief, private, rarely involve extended conversation, and the bereaved person almost always knows the loved one is still dead. They comfort; they do not convince people that the dead have physically returned. The disciples’ claim was not that they sensed Jesus’s presence but that he was raised and they ate with him, proclaimed publicly at the risk of their lives, and accepted by a persecutor who was not grieving at all.

About this exhibit

This objection is to Hallucination or grief visions.

The claim here is that the sightings were not real but psychological, brought on by grief and expectation. The strongest form of this view is that intense mourning can produce vivid experiences of a…

Under Claim 05: A real resurrection is the best explanation of the facts.