Objection · Case 05 · Relativism

Christianity has its own cultural-relativism problem. Biblical morality permitted slavery and polygamy; later Christians called those wrong. If moral progress needs a standard above culture, wasn’t the Bible’s culture measured and found wanting too?

One objection from the free evidence repository at apologetics.pro.

Suggest a correction

Response

This is the objection a fair reader raises immediately, and it deserves a straight answer. The Christian response is that the Bible itself contains the standard by which those practices were later judged (humans made in God’s image, love of neighbor, neither slave nor free), and that the trajectory of Scripture runs from regulating existing institutions toward undermining them. Critics reply that this reads later conclusions back into the text, and that debate is real. Either way, the argument for a standard above culture is not weakened by the fact that Christians have had to be corrected by it. That is what a standard above culture is for.

About this exhibit

This objection is to Cultural consensus, or cultural relativism, as in James Rachels.

The cultural relativist says right and wrong are set by each society, so morality is a shared convention that lets a community function. James Rachels lays out this position carefully in “The…

Under Claim 04: If objective moral duties are real, the best explanation is a moral source beyond human beings rather than personal taste, cultural agreement, or evolution.