Jewish readers have always read the servant as Israel, not a coming individual. Isn’t saying the passage points to Jesus a Christian reading imposed on a Jewish text?

The collective reading, Israel as the servant, is the traditional Jewish interpretation and has real scholarly support, and Christians read this passage as pointing to Jesus rather than simply finding him there. What this exhibit needs from the text is narrower: a picture of a suffering, rejected figure whose suffering is meaningful, embedded in Israel’s Scriptures before Christianity. Whether the figure is Israel, a prophet, or the Messiah, the idea that redemptive suffering is part of God’s way with the world predates the cross, and that is all that is claimed here.