Objection · Case 06 · Problem of Evil
“Choose life” is addressed to a nation about covenant obedience, not the metaphysics of free will. A compatibilist can read it happily. Does it support the philosophical claim being made?
One objection from the free evidence repository at apologetics.pro.
Response
The verse does not settle the free will debate, and it is not claimed to. Its use is narrower: it shows that Scripture addresses people as agents whose choices matter and for which they are accountable, which is the minimal premise a free will defense needs. Whether that agency is libertarian or compatibilist is a philosophical question the text does not answer, and the exhibit on God’s sovereignty later in this claim concedes exactly that.
About this exhibit
This objection is to The book of Deuteronomy, the choice set before Israel.
Moses sets life and death, blessing and curse, before the people, then urges them, “choose life.” The passage presents a real decision placed in human hands, with real consequences either way, not a…
Under Claim 06: Scripture ties genuine love and obedience to genuine choice, which supports the idea that a world of free creatures is worth its risks.