Objection · Case 15 · Hinduism

Caste is a social and political reality, not the essence of Hindu spirituality, and plenty of Hindu teachers condemned it. Isn’t tying it to the religion a cheap shot?

One objection from the free evidence repository at apologetics.pro.

Suggest a correction

Response

The condemnation from within is real and should be credited, which is why this is framed as a contested argument rather than a verdict. But the tie to scripture is not invented by critics. The texts are there, and karma was used for centuries to justify the hierarchy as deserved. A fair account holds both: caste is not the essence of Hindu devotion, and it is not a mere accident bolted on from outside. It is a scripturally rooted feature the tradition itself is still arguing about.

About this exhibit

This objection is to The scriptural roots and Ambedkar’s critique.

The Purusha Sukta (Rig Veda 10.90) and the Manusmriti give caste a scriptural and legal basis, with karma supplying the moral rationale. Ambedkar’s Annihilation of Caste argued the system could not…

Under Claim 04: Caste has deep roots in Hindu scripture and was defended by karma, and it has also been challenged from within Hinduism, so it is a live argument the tradition has never fully settled.