Claim 6 of 9 · Case 09 · Atheism
The history of science and Christianity is not a story of constant warfare, and many founders of modern science were themselves believers.
One claim from the free evidence repository at apologetics.pro.
A common objection says science has explained away the need for God and that religion has always fought science. The historical record does not support the warfare picture. The idea of perpetual conflict traces to two late nineteenth century writers, John William Draper and Andrew Dickson White, and historians of science now widely reject their thesis as one-sided. Many builders of modern science, including Johannes Kepler, Robert Boyle, and Isaac Newton, were Christians who saw their work as studying God’s creation. Honest limit: this does not by itself prove God, and there were real disputes, with the Galileo affair the usual example, though its details are more tangled than the popular story. The point here is narrow. The claim that science and Christian faith are natural enemies is a cultural story, not a finding of history. The deeper reply to “science explains everything” is that science describes how the physical world works, while the questions of why there is a world at all, and why it is orderly and understandable, sit outside the reach of experiment.
Backed by 3 pieces of evidence
Colin A. Russell, “The Conflict of Science and Religion,” and Ronald Numbers, ed., Galileo Goes to Jail
The “always at war” premise behind this objection is rejected by the relevant experts, exactly the kind of outside, checkable evidence the objection itself calls for.
Isaac Newton, letter to Richard Bentley, 1692
The people who built modern science didn’t see it as a weapon against God, which undercuts the idea that doing science naturally pushes a person toward atheism.
Methodological naturalism and the “God of the gaps” concern
This is the strongest form of “science explains away God,” answered by separating mechanism from existence: scientific progress, real as it is, doesn’t settle the God question either way.